- Ensaio sobre a lucidez Translation from Portuguese Margaret Jull Costa – e-book
Read from June 2nd to 15th
2017
My rating:
In the capital
of a Portugal-like country, the very city infected, four years ago, with the
blindness disease, it is election day. The representatives of the three main
parties, p.i.t.m. (the party in the middle), p.o.t.r. (the party on the right)
and p.o.t.l. (the party on the left) are waiting impatiently for the citizens
to come and vote, for a heavy rain seems to keep everybody inside their homes.
However, when all morning and afternoon pass without anybody showing up, the
organizers start to worry, until 4 o’clock p.m. when everybody comes at once –
a little strange, maybe, but it looks like a return to normality. And another
surprise is in waiting when the votes are counted: almost all (more than 70%
anyway) are blank, as though the voters couldn’t or wouldn’t be bothered to read
what it was written on the ballot paper. The authorities decide to repeat the
vote, with worse results: this time more than 80% of the votes are blank.
This is the initiating
event of the story told by José Saramago’s in another of his disturbing novels:
Seeing. Everybody who had read it,
together with Wikipedia 😀, keep informing
us that this is a sequel of his famous other novel, Blindness, stressing that they should be read in this order. I
happened to do so, but I am not convinced that the order is really important
(if you are not obsessed with chronology, that is), not as important as to read
them both, anyway, because they seem to me mirror stories, with the same theme developed
in their rising action: the eternal divorce between power and reason, between
authority and humanity and arriving at the same conclusion in the falling
action: blindness is not a medical condition but a social one, and the few who
can still see are doomed a priori, since
they are unable to escape the fate that had been written for them: