– e-book
Read from January
31st to February18th 2014
My rating:
They had forgotten the abuses, the murders, the corruption, the spying, the isolation, the fear: horror had become myth. "Everybody had jobs and there wasn't so much crime."
I keep remembering those summer
nights, many years ago, when the air was heavy with the tension of passionate
discussions about Ceausescu and the political changes after his death and the
communism specter that continued to haunt our country. We were young and full of hope and mockingly
called all those regretting the past “old” and “nostalgic” while secretly being
afraid of them.
During one of these conversations a
friend of mine forecast that in the long run Ceausescu would become legend, his
evil forgotten, his few achievements overstated. That statement seemed to me so
inconceivable that I started a fight even though I knew very well he shared my
political views.
After more than twenty years,
though, my friend’s prediction doesn’t seem so fanciful anymore. We are still
too close to historical events to get a good perspective, bur how it will look
in half a millennium since more and more evoke the good times with jobs and
houses for all? Will the horror become indeed myth?
There is no much difference between
one tyrant and another. Hitler, Stalin, Ceausescu, Trujillo, whatever their
names, stirred incredible reactions in people’s souls, were loved and feared
and sincerely regretted not only by so easy to manipulate masses but also by
some intelligent personalities who seemed unable to react to the evil behind
the mask:
On the way, they could see through the windows the huge, growing crowd, swelling with the arrival of groups of men and women from the outskirts of Ciudad Trujillo and nearby towns. The line, in rows of four or five, was several kilometers long, and the armed guards could scarcely control it. They had been waiting for hours. There were heartrending scenes, outbursts of weeping, hysterical displays among those who had already reached the steps of the Palace and felt themselves close to the Generalissimo's funeral chamber
It is true that a good story, as David
Lodge reminds us, does not need history to back it up. That is, it will remain
good regardless inventions, facts distortion, and other literary lies – usually
called poetic licenses J. However books like this could truly fulfill
Sartre’s dream of a littérature engagée,
by opposing the popular myth an equally forceful one, the literary figure.
And The Feast of the Goat is this good, it is one of those novels that
superpose and finally could replace the historical figure with its own, for it
manages to sound credible even though it doesn’t use the usual tricks of the
non-fiction novel. It only blends history and fiction by using three narrative
layers: Urania’s story, the innocent victim, the conspirators’ story, the
martyrized heroes and “the Chief, the Generalissimo, the Benefactor, the Father
of the New Nation, His Excellency Dr. Rafael Leonidas Trujillo Molina”’s story,
the abject manipulator whose image is in the end debunked not by revealing his
crimes and injustices and greed and excesses, but by a merciless reduction to
ridicule:
He seemed half crazed with despair. Now I know why. Because the prick that had broken so many cherries wouldn't stand up anymore. That's what made the titan cry.
It is only fair to break the idols’
clay feet. And much, much better to mock them than to forget they existed. The
ridicule always killed better than any other weapon. And more indefeasibly.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete